Technique

The ABCDE Method

Rank every task by consequence to always work on what matters most

Overview

Difficulty: Easy
Time Required: 10-15 minutes daily planning
Best For: Students Professionals Anyone needing clear priorities

What Is It?

The ABCDE Method is a priority ranking system where you label every task on your to-do list with a letter from A to E based on the consequences of completing or not completing it. A-tasks are must-do items with serious consequences. B-tasks are should-do items with mild consequences. C-tasks are nice-to-do items with no consequences. D-tasks should be delegated. E-tasks should be eliminated entirely.

What makes the ABCDE method powerful is its focus on consequences rather than urgency or effort. Instead of asking 'What feels pressing?' you ask 'What happens if I don't do this?' This reframe cuts through the noise of a busy day and reveals what genuinely matters. Within each letter, you further rank items (A-1, A-2, A-3) to create a fully prioritized execution order.

Origin

The ABCDE Method was popularized by Brian Tracy in his productivity books, particularly Eat That Frog! (2001). Tracy drew on principles from management theory and personal experience coaching executives to develop a simple system that anyone could use daily. The method evolved from earlier ABC prioritization systems used in business management since the mid-20th century, but Tracy's addition of the D (delegate) and E (eliminate) categories made it a complete decision-making framework rather than just a ranking tool.

How to Do It

Write Down All Your Tasks

List everything you need or want to do today. Include work tasks, personal items, emails to send, calls to make — everything. Don't prioritize yet; just capture the full scope of your commitments.

Assign Each Task a Letter

Go through each task and assign: A = Must do (serious consequences if not done), B = Should do (mild consequences if not done), C = Nice to do (no real consequences), D = Delegate (someone else can do this), E = Eliminate (not worth doing at all). Be honest — most tasks aren't truly A-level.

Number Within Each Letter

If you have multiple A-tasks, rank them: A-1 is the most important, A-2 is next, and so on. Do the same for B-tasks. This creates a complete priority sequence. A-1 is your most important task of the day — your 'frog.'

Execute in Order

Start with A-1 and don't move to A-2 until it's complete. Never work on a B-task while an A-task remains unfinished. This discipline ensures your most consequential work always gets your best energy.

Delegate D-Tasks and Eliminate E-Tasks

Don't just ignore D and E items — actively handle them. Send delegation requests for D-tasks with clear instructions. Delete E-tasks from your list entirely. Both actions free up time and mental energy for A-level work.

The Science Behind ABCDE Method

The ABCDE Method leverages consequential thinking, which research in behavioral economics shows produces better decisions than emotional or urgency-based thinking. Daniel Kahneman's work on System 1 versus System 2 thinking explains why: our fast, intuitive System 1 gravitates toward urgent, visible tasks, while the deliberate analysis required to assess consequences engages System 2 — our more rational decision-making system.

The method also addresses the completion bias documented by researchers at the Zeigarnik lab: we prefer to complete many small tasks (clearing the easy C-items) over making progress on fewer large ones (the hard A-items). By imposing a strict execution order, the ABCDE Method overrides this bias and channels effort toward high-consequence work.

The elimination step (E-tasks) aligns with research on subtraction as a decision strategy. Studies by Leidy Klotz show that humans default to adding rather than subtracting, even when removing tasks, commitments, or features would be more effective. The explicit E category gives you permission to subtract — a powerful productivity lever most people never pull.

Benefits

Forces clarity about what truly matters by focusing on consequences

Prevents low-value tasks from crowding out high-value work

The delegation category builds the habit of leveraging others' time

The elimination category provides permission to drop unimportant tasks

Creates a complete daily execution plan in minutes

Pairs naturally with other techniques like Eat the Frog (A-1 = your frog)

Simple enough to do on paper with no special tools

Limitations

Requires honest assessment of consequences, which ego can distort

Doesn't account for task dependencies (A-2 might require B-1 to be done first)

Daily re-sorting can feel tedious if your task list is very long

Delegation isn't always possible for solo workers or students

Can oversimplify complex projects with interdependent tasks

Variations

ABC Only

Simplified version dropping D and E for people who can't delegate and have already pruned their lists. Just rank everything as A (must), B (should), or C (could).

Weekly ABCDE

Apply the method to your weekly task list instead of daily. Rank projects and goals by consequence, then break A-level items into daily tasks.

ABCDE + Eisenhower

Use the Eisenhower Matrix for the initial urgent/important sort, then apply ABCDE ranking within each quadrant for finer-grained prioritization.

Using ABCDE Method with BuckleTime

The ABCDE Method identifies your highest-consequence tasks; BuckleTime provides the focused environment to execute them. After your morning sorting ritual, take your A-1 task directly into a BuckleTime session. Declaring your most consequential task in front of other focused workers adds a layer of commitment that makes procrastination much harder.

BuckleTime is especially valuable for A-tasks because these are often the hardest, most cognitively demanding items — exactly the kind of work that benefits from body doubling and environmental accountability. The Focus Points you earn for completing A-task sessions feel doubly rewarding because you know you spent your time on what matters most.

For teams, the ABCDE Method creates shared language for prioritization. When team members drop into a BuckleTime room and declare 'Working on my A-1,' everyone understands the significance. This shared framework, combined with the ambient accountability of working alongside focused colleagues, creates a culture where high-consequence work consistently gets done.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many A-tasks should I have per day?

Ideally one to three. If everything is an A-task, you're not being honest about consequences. Most days have one truly critical task, a couple of important ones, and many that feel urgent but carry few real consequences.

What's the difference between ABCDE and the Eisenhower Matrix?

The Eisenhower Matrix uses two dimensions (urgent vs. important) to create four quadrants. ABCDE uses one dimension (consequence severity) to create five levels. Both are prioritization tools, but ABCDE is simpler to apply daily while Eisenhower gives a richer strategic view. They work well together.

How do I handle a B-task that becomes urgent?

Reassess its consequences. If the consequences have genuinely increased (a deadline approaching), promote it to an A-task. The letters should reflect current reality, not yesterday's assessment. Re-sort as needed throughout the day.

What if I can never get past my A-tasks?

That might be fine — if you're completing your highest-consequence work every day, you're being productive. But if A-tasks consistently overflow, you may be overcommitting. Consider delegating more, saying no to new commitments, or breaking A-tasks into smaller pieces.

Can students use this method?

Absolutely. For students, A-tasks might be studying for tomorrow's exam or finishing a paper due this week. B-tasks could be reviewing notes for next week's class. C-tasks might be organizing your desk. The consequence lens works regardless of whether you're in a boardroom or a dorm room.

Try this technique with BuckleTime

Focus alongside others and get the accountability you need to make it stick.

Start focusing — it's free

Already have an account? Sign in